Early Mediation in Florida: When to Settle and What to Prove

4 days ago

5 min read

When should a Florida business dispute go to mediation? Robert J. Becerra, founder of Becerra Law, P.A. in Coral Gables, makes the case for early mediation: a short session right after initial disclosures, before depositions, expert fees, and hard feelings pile up. Bob has spent more than 30 years in international trade litigation and white collar defense, and he joined me on the Meaningful Mediation Podcast to talk about how he negotiates.

His work in customs seizures and white collar defense puts him across the table from federal prosecutors and seizing agencies. That's an unusual vantage point, and it gave him sharp views on timing, damages, evidence, and getting a deal done when one side would rather fight than pay.

Summary

Mediation in a filed case is going to happen. The real question is when.
Florida's initial disclosures now put witnesses, documents, damages, and insurance on the table early enough to support a short early mediation.
Damages, not liability, is where most cases are won or lost at the table.
When money itself is the sticking point, look for terms that aren't money.

When is the right time to mediate a Florida business dispute?

Bob's answer is earlier than most case management orders allow. The standard schedule pushes mediation toward the end of the case, after both sides have spent heavily and dug in. By then, a settlement often happens only because someone runs out of money or patience.

Cases have to mediate, right? If they're filed, the whole question really is when should it happen.

His proposal is a short, time-limited mediation, maybe two hours, held right after the parties exchange initial disclosures. If it works, everyone saves a fortune. If it doesn't, the case goes on the old way, with the usual mediation later.

The timing makes more sense now than it did a few years ago. Since January 1, 2025, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 has required parties to serve initial disclosures within 60 days of service of the complaint. Those disclosures cover witnesses, documents, a computation of each category of damages, and insurance that might pay a judgment. Bob compared it to the preliminary disclosures an arbitrator orders before a hearing.

He also pushed back on the idea that you need certainty to settle. "The parties know their dispute better than the lawyers do," he said. "They've been living it, right?" And sometimes the disclosures change the conversation on their own:

You might see in the disclosures a witness list, going, who's this? And then you find out, well, that's the witness that totally tubes your case.

I've written that the timing is right when the parties have the information they need to evaluate the case. You can read that view in my article on scheduling mediation. Bob's proposal asks a fair question about it: how much information is enough?

Why should you focus on damages before mediation?

Because liability gets argued forever, but a case only pays if the damages can be proved. When I asked Bob for his single most important negotiation strategy, he didn't hesitate.

The single most important thing, I think, especially going into mediation, is understanding the damages portion of the case.

He studies the other side's damages discovery and asks the hard questions. Is this number speculative? Does the expert have real experience in the field? Is the lost profits model built on anything? If you can show the other lawyer a real problem with the damages, they have every reason to mediate reasonably.

On the plaintiff's side, the work is simpler when the damages are concrete. An unpaid invoice is easy to prove. Future lost profits usually need an expert and a model that will be attacked. My article on the risk-adjusted value of a case shows how to turn that analysis into numbers.

How does putting the other side to its proof change the negotiation?

It changes it a lot, because evidence that looks strong in discovery may never reach a jury. Bob learned this early in criminal defense, and he still applies it in civil cases.

He described a recent trial that settled during jury selection. The other side planned to prove its case with third-party emails, had no witness to authenticate them, and the judge excluded them after a hearing on a motion in limine.

If somebody else sends you a record they created and all you're doing is archiving it in your system, it doesn't automatically become an admissible business record under the business records hearsay exception.

Florida's business records exception, section 90.803(6), requires a foundation through a records custodian, another qualified witness, or a proper certification. Bob's concern is that lawyers who spend more time in arbitration, where the rules of evidence are looser, forget to plan for it. At mediation, the question "how are you going to get that into evidence?" can move a number fast.

What can you offer besides money?

Sometimes the obstacle isn't the amount. It's that one business owner can't stand the idea of paying the other. Bob has heard plenty of clients say they'd rather pay their lawyer than pay the other side, even when settling would cost less than a trial.

His fix is creativity. "Sometimes you have to be out of the box rather than once again just offering money," he told me. In one dispute, his client refused to pay a dime. The settlement that worked was a shipment of goods at no charge instead of a cash payment. To Bob, the value was about the same. To his client, not writing a check was what mattered.

He ties this to knowing your audience. Find out why the other side really didn't pay. Was it a quality problem? A late delivery that cost them a customer? If so, a discount on a future order may settle the case and keep a business relationship alive. As Bob put it, "Ultimately people want to do business. They want to make profits."

The Takeaway

Bob's message comes down to preparation and timing. Know your damages. Know which of your evidence will survive an objection. Know what the other side needs, which may not be money. Brief your client on the good, the bad, and the cost before you walk in. And think hard about whether your case could settle after initial disclosures instead of after a year of discovery.

Not every case is ready that early. But the ones that are can save your client a great deal of money and frustration.

If you have a business dispute where an early, well-prepared mediation could make a difference, I'd welcome the chance to help. You can schedule a mediation with me through Salmon & Dulberg.

Schedule a Mediation

Less dispute. More resolution.